Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖzden, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorÖzkeskin, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAr, Ege
dc.contributor.authorYüceyar, Nur
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-26T08:48:28Z
dc.date.available2022-07-26T08:48:28Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖzden, F., et al. "Gait Assessment in Shaped Pathways: The Test-Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Figure of Eight Test and L Test in Multiple Sclerosis Patients without Mobility Aids." Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, vol. 65, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2022.103998.en_US
dc.identifier.issn22110348
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103998
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/10133
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To our knowledge, no other studies have demonstrated the reliability and validity of the Figure of Eight Walking Test (F8WT) and L Test in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to prove the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the F8WT and L Test in patients with MS. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 52 patients with MS. A clinical neurologist evaluated patients by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Participants completed the F8WT, L Test, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25FW) in the first assessment session. Then, the F8WT and L Test was retested one hour later. The same evaluator completed all of the assessments. Results: The ICC of both tests were excellent (ICCF8WT: 0.972, ICCL Test: 0.986). F8WT and L test measurement did not show a systematic bias and were within the agreement limits. The Standard Error of Measurement (SEM95) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC95) values of the F8WT was 0.58 and 1.60, respectively. Besides, L Test's SEM95 and MDC95 were 0.59 and 1.63. The correlation between F8WT with TUG, T25FW and EDSS was 0.849, 0.810 and 0.453. On the other hand, the L test's correlation coefficient with TUG, T25FW and EDSS 0.682, 0.706 and 0.535, respectively (p < 0.01). Individuals with “EDSS ≤ 1″ had statistically significantly better L-test and F8WT scores than those with “EDSS: 1 to 4.5″ (p < 0.01). Conclusion: F8WT and L Test is a valid and reliable physical performance test in MS patients without mobility aids. Both tests demonstrate advanced gait assessment in L and 8 shaped pathways to provide more comprehensive evaluation than horizontal pathways.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.msard.2022.103998.en_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectTimed 25-Foot Walk Testen_US
dc.subjectFigure of Eight Walking Testen_US
dc.subjectL testen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectTimed Up and Go Testen_US
dc.titleGait assessment in shaped pathways: The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the figure of eight test and L test in multiple sclerosis patients without mobility aidsen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Köyceğiz Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu, Sağlık Bakım Hizmetleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-6593-3758en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖzden, Fatih
dc.identifier.volume65en_US
dc.relation.journalMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disordersen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster