Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Önder
dc.contributor.authorBilgiç, Ethem
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Elif Tuğçe
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Tuğba
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Fatma Çigdem
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T14:51:40Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T14:51:40Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0002-9610
dc.identifier.issn1879-1883
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.02.008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/1789
dc.description0000-0001-8252-3339en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000415221700007en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed ID: 28359560en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Limberg flap (LF) procedure is widely performed for the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (SPS); however, recurrences continues to be observed. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between LF designs and the risk of SPS recurrence. Methods: Sixty-one cases with recurrent disease (study group) and 194 controls, with a minimum of 5 recurrence-free years following surgery (control group), were included in the study. LF reconstructions performed in each group were classified as off-midline closure (OMC) and non-OMC types. Subsequently, the 2 groups were analyzed. Results: After adjustment for all variables, non-OMC types showed the most prominent correlation with recurrence, followed by interrupted suturing type, family history of SPS, smoking, prolonged healing time, and younger age. The best cut-off value for the critical distance from the midline was found to be 11 mm (with 72% sensitivity and 95% specificity for recurrence). Conclusions: We recommend OMC modifications, with the flap tailored to create a safe margin of at least 2 cm between the flap borders and the midline. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.item-language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherExcerpta Medica Inc-Elsevier Science Incen_US
dc.item-rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinusen_US
dc.subjectOff-Midline Closureen_US
dc.subjectLimberg Flapen_US
dc.subjectModified Limbergen_US
dc.subjectPilonidal Diseaseen_US
dc.subjectRecurrenceen_US
dc.titleDistal scar-to-midline distance in pilonidal Limberg flap surgery is a recurrence-promoting factor: A multicenter, case-control studyen_US
dc.item-typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖzcan, Önder
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.02.008
dc.identifier.volume214en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage811en_US
dc.identifier.endpage819en_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster