dc.contributor.author | Elgin, Mehmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Sober, Elliott | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-20T15:06:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-20T15:06:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0004-8402 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-6828 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2014.948022 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/3161 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000348853900001 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Sober [2011] argues that some causal statements are a priori true and that a priori causal truths are central to explanations in the theory of natural selection. Lange and Rosenberg [2011] criticize Sober's argument. They concede that there are a priori causal truths, but maintain that those truths are only 'minimally causal'. They also argue that explanations that are built around a priori causal truths are not causal explanations, properly speaking. Here we criticize both of Lange and Rosenberg's claims. | en_US |
dc.item-language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd | en_US |
dc.item-rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.title | Causal, A Priori True, and Explanatory: A Reply to Lange and Rosenberg | en_US |
dc.item-type | editorial | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | MÜ, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü | en_US |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Elgin, Mehmet | |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Sober, Elliott | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00048402.2014.948022 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 93 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 167 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 171 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Australasian Journal of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Diğer | en_US |