• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Complementary/Alternative Medicine Experience in Cancer Patients: A Questionnaire-Based Survey

Date

2014

Author

Dogu, Gamze G.
Kargi, Aysegul
Tanrıverdi, Özgür
Yaren, Arzu
Demiray, Gokcen
Taskoylu, Burcu Y.
Ergin, Ahmet

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

A study was designed to evaluate the frequency of complementary/alternative therapy (CAM) knowledge and usage in cancer patients. A 23-item survey questionnaire was administered to 494 patients who received chemotherapy in the medical oncology department of three hospitals between June 2011 and December 2011. After giving written informed consent, patients completed a self-administered questionnaire. Differences among participants were assessed by using the SPSS 17.0 software. Of the 494 patients, 48% had heard of CAM, and 23.5% had used at least one CAM model. Herbs and vitamins were the most frequently used approach (82.2%). The most commonly used herb was the stinging nettle (55.5%). Marital status (p=0.003), educational status (p<0.001), monthly income (p<0.001), knowledge about disease (p<0.001), family history of comorbidity (p<0.012), and place of residence (0.004) were statistically significant for knowledge about CAM. However, marital status (p<0.001), comorbidity (p=0.004), educational status (p=0.006), family history of comorbidity (p=0.008), and family history of cancer (p=0.03) were statistically significant for CAM use. Logistic regression analysis showed that educational status (p=0.015), high monthly income (p=0.03), knowledge about disease (p=0.005), and a family history of comorbidity (p=0.005) were statistically significant for knowledge about CAM. Otherwise, only marital status (p<0.001) and comorbidity (p=0.04) were determined as independent factors for CAM use. Health professionals should routinely ask their patients about CAM use and discuss the reasons and outcomes of use. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine possible risks and benefits associated with CAM use.

Source

Uhod-Uluslararasi Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi

Volume

24

Issue

1

URI

https://doi.org/10.4999/uhod.12008
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/3624

Collections

  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6219]
  • TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [3005]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6466]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Muğla

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Guide|| Instruction || Library || Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University || OAI-PMH ||

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Muğla:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.