• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@Muğla
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Changes in Ocular Parameters and lntraocular Lens Powers in Aging Cycloplegic Eyes

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam metin / Full text (134.2Kb)

Date

2017

Author

Özyol, Pelin
Özyol, Erhan
Baldemir, Ercan

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

PURPOSE: Age-related changes in lens elasticity and ciliary muscle contractility can affect how ocular parameters respond to cycloplegia, and therefore intraocular lens (IOL) power measurements calculated by formulas using anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), or white-to-white (WtW) for effective lens position prediction can vary. In response, using swept-source optical biometry in prepresbyopic and presbyopic eyes, we investigated changes in ocular parameters and IOL power calculations attributable to cycloplegia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: In 38 prepresbyopic and 42 presbyopic eyes, we measured pupil diameter, radius of corneal curvature values, central corneal thickness, WtW, ACD, LT, and axial length both before and after cycloplegia. We determined IOL power calculations with the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/theoretical, Holladay 2, and Haigis formulas. To pinpoint the effect of cycloplegia, we recorded refractive predictions in pre- and postdilation conditions according to the same IOL power calculations, even if postdilation IOL power calculations had changed. RESULTS: With cycloplegia, pupil diameter changed significantly more in presbyopic eyes (P < .001). Central corneal thickness decreased in prepresbyopic eyes (P = .048), whereas WtW increased in presbyopic eyes (P = .02). In both groups, ACD and LT changed significantly (P < .001). IOL power calculations according to the Holladay 2 formula differed in prepresbyopic eyes (P = .042), and refractive predictions with the Holladay 2 and Haigis formulas differed significantly in prepresbyopic eyes (P = .043 and P = .022, respectively). CONCLUSION: Surgeons should consider the effect of cycloplegia on refractive prediction errors and IOL power calculations determined with Haigis and Holladay 2 formulas, especially in prepresbyopic ages. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Source

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volume

173

URI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.032
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12809/2239

Collections

  • Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Koleksiyonu [215]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2082]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6219]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6466]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Muğla

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Guide|| Instruction || Library || Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University || OAI-PMH ||

Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Muğla:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.